Analysis
Marvell Prevails Against Jasmine Networks in Trade Secrets Case
Marvell announced that a Santa Clara Superior Court Jury in California found in its favor, rejecting misappropriation of trade secrets allegations brought on behalf of Jasmine Networks, Inc. The jury unanimously found that Marvell did not use or acquire any Jasmine trade secrets and did not violate any nondisclosure agreements.
We hMarvell refused to settle the case at any price, confident that the California justice system would eventually vindicate Marvell and its employees, said Jim Laufman, Vice President and General Counsel of Marvell. Marvell would like to thank the jury for its diligence, serving faithfully since late September.
Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge William J. Elfving presided over the case. Marvell is represented by Latham & Watkins, LLP.